ScienceIQ.com

Distant Mountains Influence River Levels 50 Years Later

Rainfall in the mountains has a major influence on nearby river levels, and its effects can be seen as much as 50 years after the rain has fallen, according to hydrologists funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Scientists had believed that the downslope distance from a mountain to a river is significant, such that rain falling on a ...

Continue reading...

RiverLevels
Biology

Flu Pandemics in the 20th Century

If a flu virus emerges that is either new or that has not circulated in many years, and if it is able to spread easily from person to person, it could quickly travel around the world and cause serious ... Continue reading

FluPandemics
Medicine

Ultrasound In Medicine

In medical testing, ultrasound equipment is used to produce a sonogram, or a picture of organs inside the body. Ultrasound scanners do not use X-rays. They use waves of such high frequency that they ... Continue reading

UltrasoundInMedicine
Geology

Fossil Energy - The Basics

Contrary to what many people believe, fossil fuels are not the remains of dead dinosaurs. In fact, most of the fossil fuels we find today were formed millions of years before the first dinosaurs. ... Continue reading

FossilEnergyTheBasics
Biology

Why Aren't Mice More Like Us?

The sequence of the human genome was published two years ago, and recently, the sequence of the mouse genome was published. Amazingly, 99% of mouse genes have a counterpart in people. So why are they ... Continue reading

Mice

The Strange Case Of Phineas Gage

PhineasGageLong before the advent of neuroscience, brain injuries have been used to deduce how the brain is organized into separate regions handling separate tasks. Consider the case of Phineas Gage, a 19th-century railroad construction foreman whose life was dramatically changed when a dynamite charge went off accidentally and blasted a 3 1/2-foot long, 1 1/4-inch in diameter, 13 1/2-pound iron tamping rod into his left cheek, through his upper jaw, through his brain behind his left eye, and out the top of his skull. That kind of injury would surely kill a person, right? Not necessarily. Gage was stunned, but not even knocked unconscious, and before long felt well enough to return to work. The problem was, as his friends and acquaintances said, he was no longer Gage.

The tamping rod had destroyed part of the frontal lobe of his brain (the left ventromedial part, according to reconstructions performed by University of Iowa neuroscientists Hanna and Antonio Damasio), with the bizarre result that his personality was, in effect, that of a completely different person. Instead of the responsible, conscientious man he had formerly been, he had somehow turned into a foul-mouthed, impulsive, irresponsible boor. Even though his intelligence and abilities were exactly the same as before the accident, he was unable to continue his work as foreman.

The strange case of Phineas Gage offers insight into the role that the brain's frontal lobes play in what are sometimes known as 'executive' functions: monitoring one's own behavior, controlling impulses, and generally acting like a mature, rational, socially responsible person. The disturbing thing about Gage's case is that it challenges some of our most basic assumptions about identity and morality, including some of the very assumptions on which our legal system is based. Gage was fully conscious of the consequences of his actions, but nevertheless acted antisocially. Are some sociopaths simply people with abnormalities of their frontal lobes, who are no more to blame for their actions than Gage was for his?